To: | kc7qy@att.net, "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots) |
From: | Marshall-K5QE <k5qe@k5qe.com> |
Date: | Fri, 6 Jan 2017 20:33:44 -0600 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Hello All....this entire thread is EXACTLY WHY a lot of ops will NEVER
use LOTW. The "security" is maniacal, it is way too hard to use, it is
based on a defective standard, it only supports a small number of
awards, and is a direct assault on the QSL system that has served us
well for nearly 100 years.
I want a real QSL card that I can use for any award, anywhere, anytime. If anyone wants/needs a QSL card from me, all they have to do is to send me one of theirs(I really do appreciate an SAE too). #NeverLOTW 73 Marshall K5QE On 1/6/2017 5:18 PM, kc7qy@att.net wrote: Bill, Glad to see getting your logs up on LoTW, wish more people would. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots), kc7qy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots), Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots), kc7qy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots), Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |