VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover cllsign vs logging robots NOW LoTW certificate

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover cllsign vs logging robots NOW LoTW certificates
From: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:47:12 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
That's an important point.
While the initial LoTW callsign validation takes a while (and I think still includes something mailed to your FCC address), any additional callsigns that can be clearly tied to an existing certificate get setup quickly.

73, Bob K0NR

On 06-Jan-17 8:20 AM, Keith Morehouse wrote:
After hearing from many people who had gone the extra mile and procured
what W9FZ called a "child" cetificate, I applied for and received a "rover"
LoTW certificate for our club call, which is what I rove with.  Now I have
certificates for W0VOA and W0VOA/R.

It was interesting to see that the "child" certificate procedure is very
streamlined and quick.  The file was in my hands within 12 hours of
applying for it.  Filing the "child" request took about 45 seconds.

Jay W9RM
DM58 CO

Keith J Morehouse
Managing Partner
Calmesa Partners G.P.
Olathe, CO
_______________________________________________


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>