It's time for me to stop the digest and get these emails directly. So
glad to hear the comments coming. There is a solution out there and I
think it will be a combination of several things.
ON4KST is a great choice for when you have the time to chat. One of the
brilliant things about that page is that it does include a filtered
display of spots. Most of what I've seen is EU spots, but we can
change that by generating our own NA spots as well.
At times it may be necessary to consult the chat page to gain that new
grid / multiplier, but when the going is fast the place to stay is
usually the logger when you are busy and the major loggers are all set
up to present filtered spotting activity to your attention. It's a
proven tool in very busy (HF) contests. Why not use what we already
have in our hands.
My belief at this time is that the existing amateur radio cluster (which
seems to be used heavily by the EU crowd) should be at the core of our
common attention gathering efforts.
One of the thoughts that came out of our initial workshop was to employ
a gateway to feed the cluster.
For instance we can take APRS data gleaned from Rovers who are ready and
in position to operate and post it to the cluster. This covers Rovers
who may not be in cell phone range at their location. If they do have
coverage it will be possible for this gateway to put an APRS message out
on the cluster or to take a twitter feed and put it out on the cluster.
As has already been mentioned there is a talk mechanism that allows
private messages to be passed between cluster users; we need to pursue
that further. These messages show up in a logger window in Highlighted
fashion. Several of us did some experimenting with this function in
the 222 sprint. There is much to discover, and perhaps much to develop
further here.
My next task is to evaluate further the internal schema of the cluster
traffic to see just what latitude we have going forward.
I know that there are at least two cluster programs being used;
AR-Cluster and DX Spider. There seems to be a difference in capability
here which we need to explore. Is there anyone out there in the VHF
community with intimate knowledge of these features?
There are also opportunities to build more functionality into the
loggers that we use.
I'll stop rambling now. Perhaps we can start a few separate threads
here to keep focused on how we can really make the new rules work to our
mutual advantage.
73,
Phil K3TUF
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|