VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Comments on ARRL VHF/UHF Contest Rules Change Propos

To: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>, VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Comments on ARRL VHF/UHF Contest Rules Change Proposals
From: Steve <kb8vao@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:22:44 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Can you Please tell me where I can find all of the proposed rule changes? I 
would like to read them.

Thanks & 73,
Steve, KB8VAO 

Sent from my Droid Charge on Verizon 4G LTE

James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net> wrote:

>If you have comments on the proposed rules changes for VHF/UHF contests, they 
>are due December 15 to the committee at < vhf-input@arrl.org >.
>
>I personally am not going to campaign here for any of the rules changes, 
>except for the one allowing single op stations to have multiple signals on 
>different bands at the same time without being in the multi category. I think 
>that this will increase activity as it will increase signals on the air, so 
>someone who tunes to the bands during a contest is more likely to hear 
>activity. This should also help with the problem of people ignoring the higher 
>bands when 6M is open by encouraging ops to use SO2R techniques. If 6M is 
>open, the single op can still CQ on two at the same time, and pickup stations 
>calling there. I don’t see any down side to this proposed change, and I 
>encourage you to comment favorably on this proposed rules change. 
>
>In the past there has been a lot of discussion here, and elsewhere, on 
>assistance in VHF/UHF contests, and I hope that those who have been vocal on 
>both sides of that issue have made or will make their input to the committee 
>known. The proposed rules are very liberal with respect to assistance, even 
>with respect to the CQ WW VHF contest rules, so I encourage you to read the 
>proposed changes and ponder their consequences for you and others. Then make 
>constructive comments on the proposals.
>
>The proposed rules allow self spotting pretty much in all categories and 
>pretty through all vehicles. This is a big change with potentially big 
>consequences, so I encourage you to comment on this as well. Consider that 
>self spotting is not thought of well by most of the HF contesters and those 
>are some of the new activity that the committee is trying to attract. 
>
>Read and study the proposed rules changes. Make your concerns and desires 
>known to the committee now. Don’t pass on this opportunity. If rules are 
>adapted that you don’t like and you didn’t comment on them to the rule makers, 
>then it will be hard to seriously take your criticism of them later. Just 
>saying. - Duffey KK6MC
>--
>KK6MC
>James Duffey
>Cedar Crest NM
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>