VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6
From: David Muller <dm5957@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 16:28:51 -0400
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Just  sent an update on Mini-Horse antenna.  Thought I was replying to recent 
post,
but saw after hitting "send" that it was not.

However, have thought of using them as stacked 3 elements on 6m or 2m.
I could manage 8 foot separation on pushed up mast--one band--as in sprint.

I recommend over a Moxon, which I have also used.  Easier design, and stable 
construction
without the gap alignment issue.  Only thing it lack is the sharp F/B notch, if 
that matters.

David  AB2YI


On Aug 9, 2014, at 12:00 PM, vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com wrote:

> 
> 
>   1. Stacked Moxon's (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
>   2. Re: Stacked Moxon's (Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting)
>   3. Re: Stacked Moxon's (Keith Morehouse)
>   4. K5N--Last Announcement before we travel to DM71... (Marshall-K5QE)
> 
> From: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] Stacked Moxon's
> Date: August 8, 2014 2:48:46 PM EDT
> To: VHF Contesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> 
> 
> I'm playing around with some ideas for portable activation and roving.
>  Would there be any advantage to stacking moxons on six?  I'm
> thinking that you could tighten the vertical angle some but don't know
> if that would really help or hurt?   I presume that you would space
> them as you would any yagi. Or am I so far off base I should be
> embarrassed for asking :-)
> 
> -- 
> Mike Urich KA5CVH
> http://ka5cvh.com
> 
> http://ka5cvh.com/faith/salvation.htm
> The highest governmental "authority" in America is its Constitution.

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 140, Issue 6, David Muller <=