To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014 |
From: | beamar via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | beamar <beamar@aol.com> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:27:25 -0400 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
A very good point. What this would mean is that part of a legally binding agreement is now no longer legal. You cannot write a contract to do something illegal. Is the legislation retrospective or just prospective? Unless the bill is quite clear about this, it will probably be litigated. Buddy WB4OMG On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:32:42 PM, "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com> wrote: There is no link to the actual legislation, but if this bill has language in it that would direct the federal government to void part of a private legal contract between two parties, then I don't see it passing. Going forward, maybe, but even that's a stretch. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014, Bob Burns W9BU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014, Peter Laws |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014, Bob Burns W9BU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |