VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Contest Scoring in General

To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Contest Scoring in General
From: Joseph Nieves <n2tee73@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Joseph Nieves <n2tee73@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 21:32:34 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
All:

I would first like to say how appreciative I am of all the hard work that goes 
into scoring and sponsoring a contest.  Since this labor of love is for the 
most part done strictly by volunteers, I can assume the hardware, bandwidth, 
storage and dedicated human resources vary wildly amongst different projects 
which in turn impact publication times.  From a scorers perspective, what are 
the most time consuming tasks?  I can make my own general assumptions (paper 
logs, wide gap in time-stamps, exchange anomalies, multiple script runs etc.), 
yet this means nothing since I've never participated in this activity.

While on this topic, are there generally accepted norms for things like 
time-stamp discrepancy allowances or other fungible factors?  Does each contest 
have their own scoring schema?  A bit curious since I've never come across any 
sort of published algorithm on how scoring should be done.

Thanks,
Joe N2TEE
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] Contest Scoring in General, Joseph Nieves <=