John,
This is far enough away from the original design frequency that it's anybody's
guess. It's really a function of the design of the transition. It's a lot
harder to make a transition work well over a broad bandwidth. My guess is that
it probably works OK for our purposes at 24 Ghz (it transfers energy without
too much loss) but the that the impedance match isn't all that great. It's
anybody's guess how well it works at 24 GHz unless it can be measured.
- Paul w2ped
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:59:35 -0400
> From: jdausilio@gmail.com
> To: microwave@lists.valinet.com; VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: [Mw] wr42-sma transition ..
>
> I've got a transition I got from Owen which is marked 17.70-19.70 GHz
> .. I'm wondering if this will work well enough at 24G or not. Compared
> to Procomm transitions it's much shorter, though the backshort looks
> to be about the same length ..
>
> de w1rt/john
> _______________________________________________
> Microwave mailing list
> microwave@lists.valinet.com
> http://lists.valinet.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/microwave
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|