To: | VHF Contesting email <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Oops... nevermind |
From: | Steve Clifford <k4gun.r@gmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:00:18 -0500 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I see I misread the soapbox entry. The operator in question was running as a fixed multi-op station. Nothing wrong with that. However, I guess I still wonder if rovers are considered multi-op stations with regard to the rule. Steve K4GUN/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] 70 cm allocations, James Duffey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems), Steve Clifford |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] 70 cm allocations, James Duffey |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems), Steve Clifford |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |