VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Adding a band, which one?

To: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Adding a band, which one?
From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:06:59 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Well, in terms of required grids, you need 50 for 222 MHz VUCC and 25 for
1296 MHz VUCC. So you only need half the grids for 1296.

Whether that is easier or not is hard to say. Usually when I can work
someone on 222, I can also work them on 1296.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:52 PM, John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I guess part of the answer depends on your goals and intestests also.  If
> you also are into satellites, or want to get into the satellites, then
> 1.2ghz would be the better band.  Same for if you want to do EME.
>
> If space is a limitation 1.2G also might be the choice.  Overall smaller
> antennas, and since you can get high gain in fairly short booms you can put
> a 23cm yagi closer to other antennas on the same mast.  However, hardline
> coax becomes a necessity at these frequencies.
>
> Which band do people think is easier to get VUCC and endorsements on-222 or
> 1296?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
> --- On Sun, 1/10/10, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Adding a band, which one?
> > To: "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> > Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 12:00 PM
>  > Here in central Illinois, it's about
> > 50/50 as to whether stations have 222
> > or 1296. Probably there are a few more with 222 capability
> > than 1296. Most
> > people I work who have multiple bands seem to have both.
> >
> > 73, Zack W9SZ
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tim Coad <timcoad@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In the SF Bay Area, 220 wins by a huge margin.
> > >
> > > My experience is a lot of people with 1296 gear do not
> > get on for the
> > > contests and 220 contacts with the same station are
> > much easier to make
> > > with
> > > less investment of time and money. I have 1/3 the $$$
> > invested in my 220
> > > station as I do my 1296 station, but I typically work
> > 3 to 5 times more
> > > people on 220.
> > >
> > > Tim - NU6S
> > > CM87
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Dave Clouser <Dave@nz3m.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >  > I want to add a band this season.  I
> > currently run 50, 144, 432.  What
> > > > band would have the most activity in
> > northeast/mid atlantic area.  222
> > > > or 1296 or??
> > > >
> > > > Tnx 73
> > > > Dave NZ3M
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > > > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>