Well what you are talking about seems much more of a stretch than seperating a
band of 10 station workng together in unison to inflate their score and those
who do not do this. It simple just put them in the class the ARRL designed for
them and set the rules to acomidate the stated intention of the ARRL. The work
no more than 50 or 100 other rovers period would work, a percentage would work.
That is a still 100 extra multipliers for this group if they chose to be
traditional rovers.
I see by thier web page a formal complaint is in order.
Thanks
K3uhf
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:28:47 -0700
> From: aa5jg@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] rover__ Jim and Duffy's posts.
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com; k3uhf@hotmail.com
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 9/21/09, frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > what learning curve you are on. We are talking about
> > the principle of having a balanced set of rules where people
> > can enter a category with the expectation of competing with
> > others who operate in the same fashion.
> >
> >
>
> But that never happens in any contest. As I said before, many people are
> putting more operating time in than I am, and the rules don't account for
> that. Some have much bigger stations that I have, so they operate differently
> than I do. Some live in a more VHF operator dense area so they operate
> differently than I do. In the CQ HF contests they at least created a
> tribander single element category to try and help equalizing operating styles
> somewhat. The only way the VHF contests have attempted anything like that is
> thru the high power and low power categories.
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|