I disagree with Paul. What has happened in the past is 100’s of people have
gave up contesting for various reasons. The reasons for quitting have never
been examined. At least in Marshall’s plan there is feedback to the ARRl as to
why you are not competing by turning in an empty log. The logs show that there
are about 9 people in the contest for every log submitted. No effort has been
made to know why. I am quite sure over half of them are casual "drive by"
participants. But I too do not turn in a log unless I mean to compete. I do not
compete as often because I see the rules as flawed. So why not turn in a log
that says Hey I’m here, willing to participate if you do more to accommodate my
legitimate situation.
I think the loss of the assisted class makes no sense when the ARRL says they
are trying to grow the number of logs. Eliminating a class rather than trying
to accommodate growth is a big move backwards. In principle and if not in
application is bigger than the rover issue I have.
Us as a community will slowly get picked off one by one by one as the political
wim'sthat come and go if we do not stand together. It has happened with the
rovers because 90 percent of the vhf’ers do not rove. It has happened to the
EME assisted because 95 percent of us are not on the moon. What’s next
Portables? Multiops? Home stations? I guess it matters on who is on the
committees and what awards they want to complete for themselves. This is why
no one on a committee should ever be allowed to do more than a check log. The
refs do not play in the basketball games, though they sometimes bet on them.
There is a definite conflict of interest.
The ARRL will look the other way as long as qsos keep coming in to argue that
we are using the bands. No matter how the QSOs are generated and no matter how
far they are apart. Its time to put a charter down for VHF contesting and find
a direction that a majority of us can agree on and remove some of the politics.
Otherwise the papers on your walls are purely based on the politics employed
to obtain said paper.
k3uhf
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:02:45 -0700
From: k7cw@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Whats up with the ARRL?
To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com; k3uhf@hotmail.com
The Programs and Services Committee has a lot of stuff on their plate. Most of
it's members are not knowledgible about the VHF weak signal world, but they
want to help. Hence, they created the VUAC, whose members have their own
individual biases and specific lack of knowledge and/or experience.
Recommendations from the VUAC are certain to be weighted by their own biases.
Beyond that, I think that there is an ongoing "need to have contests run like
on HF" mentality and pressure being pushed on ARRL officials by those who
should have no say, such as contest log scoring volunteers, as an example.
Officials in the ARRL rely on these volunteers to take care of a lot of work
that needs to be done and must be grant them listening time. There is also a
large lobby from many old corp EMEers who have influence by virtue of past
contributions to amateur radio and the League.
So, it's not just a matter of the League officials not doing their job. It's
more complicated than that. People on the PSC have indicated that they will be
open to input regarding this "no assisted" rule. The doors haven't been locked
on this.
Something might be said for pushing for change, but this kind of activism is
unwarranted. Pushing to have people boycott contests is not called for.
73,
Paul, K7CW
--- On Sun, 8/9/09, frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Whats up with the ARRL?
To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 9:04 AM
Though I generally try to encourage vhf activity, it seems that it may be a
time to make a statement to the ARRL. Marshall suggested sending in empty logs
in response to the EME rule change. I am not versed well in EME but I think he
has a point. Un assisted may be the ultimate goal, and it is definitely more of
a challenge, but the assisted should be there to help those to the ultimate
goal if they can ever reach it.
Compare it to golf, most of us will never be pros, but we still enjoy the game
as an amateur or with a handicap. It seems that the ARRL has wiped out the
amateur and the Handicaps in this arena.
This strikes me as odd considering how they have reached out to encourage
growth in other VHF contests such as the rover category. Its my opinion that
they botched up roving as well and tried to fix it with a band aid when it
needed a major overhaul. That being said, at least the effort was there to
encourage participation even if the PSC chose to ignore some of the
suggestions of the VUAC.
In comparison to that debacle, it seems that the ARRL went the other way with
the EME contests. This shows a total lack of direction from the ARRL. It also
demonstrates that they are no better then a boat with no sail or engine and
they will simply go where the winds and currents of politics go.
This leads me to believe that the ARRL contests are fundamentally flawed and
lack any serious sense of purpose or vision. I believe in some cases like
grid circling on microwave bands they are only manufactured short range QSOs
to justify the monopolization of otherwise unused spectrum and this is why the
ARRl allows it to continue.
Its time we took a honest look at ourselves as amateur radio operators. We
have a long history of giving to the human race in various ways. But we get
down right mad if they threaten to take away some spectrum way up in the
microwaves that we will never use more than a few MHZ of. If that technology
can be put to better use then we should give it up.
Or better yet, maybe its time to find a better way to use that spectrum
ourselves and seek to redefine our licenses as to help more people. We have
let the confines of our licenses let technology pass us by and we are becoming
irrelevant unless a natural disaster hits.
I challenge the ARRL to do something useful and to lobby for a redefinition of
our privileges on the microwave bands. One idea ; Let Amateurs set up moderate
powered wireless network nodes in our spectrum above 2.4 ghz and let non hams
buy equipment to connect to them. Imagine a more free internet using ham
technology. There has to be better ideas than this. If we are to continue we
must make ourselves relevant.
All of this shows that I think the ARRL is lost. The contest system is
seriously flawed. It can never be perfect but the way they run it is half
hearted and subject to too much politics and lacks any vision or sense of
direction. The things that some of us do to get the little pieces of paper are
sometimes ludicrous and the fact that there is no real tangible standard makes
them somewhat meaning less.
If there was a way to recall the PSC I would do it. For now I agree with
Marshall, if you are alienated due to the lack common sense in the rules just
send in an empty log. Do the contest and work towards your VUCC. At least
there is a sense of direction with that award and a definite standard and the
politics behind it are laid to rest.
k3uhf
_________________________________________________________________
Get free photo software from Windows Live
http://www.windowslive.com/online/photos?ocid=PID23393::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_________________________________________________________________
Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®.
http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_express:082009
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|