So when All of this 'Slowly Starts to Die Down'.. just prior to Contest
Time.. Does it 'Start Up Again' when the Winners are Announced ? I
remember a Post from the Last ' /R Discussion we will call it '.. Cancel
Your Membership until things cool off.. then Re-Join until the Next
Debate' ! Starting to look like 'Sound Advice' ! lol
Good Luck to All in the Upcoming Contest.. Whether you Rove or Not.. or
just Drive the neighbors Nuts with TVI.. I will be doing My Best at the
Latter !
Jerry VE6CPP
DN39or
Steve Clifford wrote:
> Thanks you for that reply. I would like to hear from the pack-rover
> apologists to see if they concur with your assessment of why it was created.
>
> Steve
> K4GUN/R
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Ray J <ray@w9ray.org> wrote:
>
>
>> They can have as many operators as they want.
>> They do not need to follow the 100 qso rover limit.
>> They do not need to transport the equipment with them.
>>
>> so they can use a bus load of guys and drive and operate from one
>> multioperator hilltop site to another, and work other single rovers
>> alot..
>>
>> Mainly i think that they made the class for the super grid circler guys
>> to play in, so the other rovers will stop crying about them beating
>> them in the regular class.
>>
>> w9Ray
>>
>>
>>
>> Steve Clifford wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to hear an answer to this simple question from anybody who
>>>
>> doesn't
>>
>>> understand why the classic and limited rovers are upset about this latest
>>> flap over some obviously misguided rules. Tell me why Unlimited Rover
>>> exists. Then tell me what distinguishes those operators from the
>>>
>> operators
>>
>>> in the other two rover categories. Tell me how the operating realities
>>>
>> are
>>
>>> so different as to require a separate category.
>>>
>>> Based on the behavior of the rule making body of the ARRL, it seems as if
>>> Unlimited Rover was established for no reason other than slightly
>>>
>> reducing
>>
>>> the scores that could be submitted for club competition.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>> K4GUN/R
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.43/2139 - Release Date:
>>>
>> 05/28/09 08:10:00
>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|