Jim, might it be appropriate for the ARRL to either announce the rules
clarification on www.arrl.org or in QST? We might be a bit late for
QST, but something on the web page might reach a few more operators than
just this list alone.
BTW: hope to see you at the Atlanta Hamfest next weekend!
wa4kxy@bellsouth.net wrote:
> Being a member of the VUAC I will respond to this. The short answer is yes
> we do those things but we are only human and their are oversights. Frankly,
> we just didn't think about this issue. As a result KX9X has to step in and
> apply his interpretation, best guess, etc. For what it is worth I have no
> problem with the reponse from KX9X. Yes, it may not be what was written but
> it is a reasonable answer in light of what has been past practice with the
> limited multi and other categories. This is a good lesson for those of you
> out their who are reading these rules like they are the word of God or
> something. They were written by people such as myself. It is difficult if
> not impossible to think of every possible scenario and even more difficult to
> write the rules for every possible scenario so lighten up and apply some
> common sense like KX9X has.
>
> 73
> Jim, W4KXY
>
--
--JohnK
73 de W5NNH
10X 75371/M&M 117/SMIRK 6185/Six Club 285/TRA 2499/Norcross 228 F&AM
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 090527-0, 05/27/2009
Tested on: 5/28/2009 4:21:45 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|