To: | VHF Contesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit |
From: | Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:58:25 -0800 (PST) |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Steve Clifford <k4gun.r@gmail.com> wrote: > I find it funny that Ev is so fixated on... One either wants to fix the problem or not. The (reduced to) two simple rules fix the problem through score and strategy normalization (something that I've said since first posting it). Please don't make this a personal issue. It is not. It is a Fix. Do you want a fix or yet another band-aid? Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit, Steve Clifford |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was:Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit, Jim Forsyth |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit, Steve Clifford |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the three simple rules" [was:Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit, Jim Forsyth |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |