VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit

To: w2ev@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit
From: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:27:48 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 14:56, Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Simple and elegant.

Mike wrote

Simple sure ... elegant ... not really.  If I were to leave say going
north and run through the eastern side of one grid and come back on a
different highway the following day, presuming a two day run, on the
western side of the grid you could prevent me from making q's with
people who could not have been on the air D1 or I missed entirely
because they were on a different band or that extra 30 - 40 miles made
that big of a difference.

And all this about the time I've been trying to get back into
contesting after a long hiatus.

-- 
Mike Urich, KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com

If pro is opposite of con.
Then what is the opposite of progress?
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>