VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] 20 perent rule

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] 20 perent rule
From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:50:18 -0800
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>

The 20 percent rule has issues.  Some people would delete contacts to avoid the 
20 percent rule and the other party would get busted on the log checker.  But 
it could be tweeked.
 
If the rule read that all contacts are logged and the rover will assign points 
and multipliers to a number of contacts no greater than 20 percent of his non 
rover contact count. It would be workable in the software or hand math when 
sending in a log.
 
This also shows why these groups now hide their logs from public scrutiny via 
the ARRL committee structure.
 
The uglyness of the matter is that WAYNE”S group is morally flawed when it 
comes to this issue.  In my view he is taken his talents to a dark side.  It is 
sad when you have something so fundamentally flawed that you have to create 
rules for one group’s unreasonable action, even after these actions were 
directly addressed by the ARRL and a compromise was offered.  The ARRL created 
a “cease fire” on this issue and Wayne figured a work around.  
 
He’s kind of like the Iranians sending in the Palestinians and  Lebanese to do 
their dirty work against Israel to irritate the US.  When Isreal complains or 
does something Iran says Israelis  are the bad guys.  
 
The ARRL has a flawed contest. They should not support it in its current 
fashion or they should fix it. We all pay dues to have an honest contest.  We 
can not sit quiet because the ARRL may think there is no way to regulate Wayne.
 
So I as a rover who does not put roving on a high priority any more because of 
Wayne’s group Am willing to give up my rover to rover QSO’s to eliminate the 
cancer that is on the rover rules. I am sorry if I am sugar coating this too 
much.
 
I think a percentage system could be worked out. The failure with the last rule 
change is that they did not think about it skeptically in terms on how one man 
who is on their committee could stick his finger in the eyes of the majority of 
the committee. This is an ugly problem.  If this was a town council he would be 
ran out for not respecting the wishes of the committee as a whole. Not for 
having a dissenting vote or set of ideals.
 
History has shown this behavior before. Congress says no money for the Contras, 
and Ollie North does a work around on the behalf of the president.  This is the 
same thing here. The VUAC and ARRL stated their intent and Wayne engineered a 
work around.
 
Sorry I had to use political terms, but it’s terms we can all relate too, even 
if Ollie is your hero.
 
Like reporting crime and a meth epidemic, this controversy will go on until its 
fixed.  It would be sad if I loose all my rover to rover QSOs, but at least it 
would make me want to play rover more. 
 
K3uhf
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022009
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>