The winner... over what? A K3? If so, I'd be interested to know
why. Most people I know who have compared them say the K3 is a far
better radio. (I own a K3, but have never used an FT-2000, so I
can't comment. However, in terms of bench metrics, there is no
comparison. The K3 wins hands down.)
Bill W5WVO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul N1BUG" <paul_n1bug@verizon.net>
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:15 AM
Subject: [VHFcontesting] UPDATE Re: Yaesu FT-2000 on 6 meters
> All in all I find the rig to be much better now. If I were
making an
> informed purchasing decision today, the FT-2000 would probably
come
> out the winner despite its remaining performance shortfall.
YMMV, of
> course!
>
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|