>From AH8M/R
Some very good discussions represented here and I am enjoying the exchanges
although some people are not.
Obviously as a classic rover it has more interest for me than it might for
others. The complaint is acknowledged.
So I'll throw in a last comment and leave it at that.
If the rules are to be tweaked, all I ask is that we recognize that pack rovers
and grid circle operations are a legitimate part of the hobby. Although I don't
choose that method, their accomplishments are real. Please leave some way for
those guys to enjoy the contest also. From experience I know it takes a
tremendous effort and prior planning to put those stations on the road. There
is room in the hobby for all interest. There is no spirit of the intent etc.,
only the rules.
Those that say grid circle rovers are destroying the contest etc. etc. are
unfairly judging how others choose to enjoy the hobby. Limiting the number of
repeat contacts between rovers of ANY of the three classed to a low number
would push out a group that should be admired for their ingenuity, dedication,
and technical skills.
No matter if these guys beat me or not, I will continue to enjoy operating
rover, building my station up over time and handing out grids to fixed
stations. This stuff is FUN. And most important of all, I have seen no evidence
that others interest in operating rover is declining. I see more and more call
signs showing up.
Differing opinions are appreciated and respected. Thanks for the opportunity to
offer mine.
-----Original Message-----
>From: vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com
>Sent: Nov 20, 2008 7:49 PM
>To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
>Subject: VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 71, Issue 21
>
>Send VHFcontesting mailing list submissions to
> vhfcontesting@contesting.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> vhfcontesting-owner@contesting.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of VHFcontesting digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. what bands follow up (frank bechdoldt)
> 2. VUAC <10 qso rule comprimise & honoring history (frank bechdoldt)
> 3. Rover rules discussion (Tom Carney)
> 4. Re: Rover rules discussion (Ron Hooper)
> 5. A reasonable approach to the grid circling problem....
> (Marshall Williams)
> 6. 5.8 Ghz phones (Bill Burgess)
> 7. Re: A reasonable approach to the grid circlingproblem....
> (Chet, N8RA)
> 8. Public Logs contatc info (frank bechdoldt)
> 9. Re: QST_ June contest write up (Glen Overby)
> 10. Re: QST_ June contest write up (Gerry Hull)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:27:18 -0800
>From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
>Subject: [VHFcontesting] what bands follow up
>To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
>Message-ID: <BAY111-W3149F8A8484F4DF1F1979BEC0C0@phx.gbl>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>the what bands poll prove the point the guys in the 2 and four percent in the
>higher bands manipulated the contest rules despite the clear intent of the
>ARRL. The 2 and four prcenters do not represent the contest catagory as a
>whole but they are the winners. The super majority followed the intent. The
>poll proves the spirit of the rule's intent.
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get more done, have more fun, and stay more connected with Windows Mobile?.
>http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119642556/direct/01/
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|