Re: the message below about triplexers...
I have stacked beams for 144, 222 and 432. The cable run is
approximately 70 feet. I am also considering adding 1.2 GHz, but that is
another issue entirely.
As the coax is aging, I was considering changing it so. Mike's (WA3TTS)
message about triplexers was interesting. Any additional comments and/or
information? What triplexers would you recommend if indeed it is a
viable option?
Thanks.
Ed (W2SN)
<Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:28:55 -0400
<From: "MICHAEL SAPP" <mailto:wa3tts@verizon.net> wa3tts@verizon.net
<Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] re V/U antennas
<To: "VHF TEST REFLTR" <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
vhfcontesting@contesting.com
<Message-ID: <001e01c8e433$ff4b5050$6400a8c0@your27e1513d96">mailto:001e01c8e433$ff4b5050$6400a8c0@your27e1513d96>
001e01c8e433$ff4b5050$6400a8c0@your27e1513d96
<Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
<Hi Guys: Keep in mind that BPFs won't stop in-band harmonic energy from
coming down your coax cable and that is something to be concerned about
when a pre-<amp device danger zone is -10dbm with close antenna spacing.
<Triplexers also have good bandpass filtering and save on coax while
having low loss (.15~.5 claimed) . They seem to go $25 to $50 on ebay
which is cheaper than three separate bandpass filters. Mike WA3TTS
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|