I have been happy with the ICE 6 and 2m bandpass filters and they are
inexpensive. On 6m I run the 200w 50-50.5MHz filter after the radio and
the 6KW filter after the 8877. On 2M I run the 200w filter after the
driver amp (don't think they make a high power 2m model). My 2m yagi is
mounted between two 6m yagis (and about 6' above the lower one). Without
them I had severe noise problems to the other radio when transmitting. I
do not notice (or sometimes only barely detect) cross band interference
unless I am pointing directly at the shack (and that is probably
common-mode RFI). ICE doesn't list the 6m QRO filter on their website anymore.
I learned that filters are necessary at QRO levels with close spaced
antennas (and probably at the 100w level depending on spacing). One year I
threw up a third 6m yagi on a separate mast about 5' above my HF yagi for
the June contest and proceeded to burn out the preamp in the HF radio the
first time I transmitted on that antenna with only 600w.
At 01:42 PM 7/11/2008 -0500, Les Rayburn wrote:
>Along with Stan, several folks have mentioned using tight bandpass filters
>on both TX and RX. I looked over DCI's filters today, and saw a few that
>might fit the deal. I'm curious has to what others are using.
>
>The bandpass filter option appeals to me as I think it would provide the
>added benefit of reducing my interference levels, and providing some
>additional protection for the pre-amps and front ends. I can't imagine that
>I'm ever going to even seriously consider running more than 200-300 watts on
>any band given the indoor antennas. It will be easy to become an "alligator"
>and certainly will only cause issues with TVI/RFI, including the potential
>to interfere with the President of the HOA who lives next door.
>
>So, sources? Prices? Anything to avoid?
>
>73,
>
>
>Les Rayburn, director
>High Noon Film
>100 Centerview Drive Suite 111
>Birmingham, AL 35216-3748
>205.824.8930
>205.824.8960 fax
>205.253.4867 cell
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>From: "Stan, W1LE" <stanw1le@verizon.net>
>Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 11:08 AM
>To: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
>Subject: Re: [VHF] Antenna Coupling Issues
>
> > Hello Les, My comments are added.....
> >
> >
> > Les Rayburn wrote:
> >> 1. At what power levels (typically) does this begin to be an issue?
> >>
> > Too many variables that need controlling to comment, you are on thin ice.
> > destruct level of the preamplifier,
> > preamp isolation (filtering) for out of band signals,
> > TX power levels,
> > quality of coax being used, braided shields leak, solid shields like solid
> > copper on superflex or hardline are betrter,
> > Bypass relay isolation,
> > antenna proximity, near filed issues.
> > polarizations used,
> > Coaxial cable losses,
> > etc.
> > etc.,
> >
> >> 2. Are there steps that I can take to minimize the coupling, and protect
> >> the
> >> pre-amps and radios?
> >>
> > Coupling is proximity. Either I disable all preamplifiers not used, except
> > for the band I am playing on or
> > I have tight bandpass filters and leave the preamp on for other RX bands.
> > Tight bandpass filters for RX AND TX.
> > Another alternative is to disable all preamps on ALL bands, when I
> > transmit on any band. including HF.
> >
> > All preamplifiers default to a bypass mode, when the system is not used.
> >> 3. What do rovers in similar situations do to prevent problems?
> >>
> >
> > Rovers usually go thru a few preamplifiers until they take the previously
> > mentioned actions.
> >
> >
> > Stan, W1LE Cape Cod
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ZZZZZz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
73, Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee (ex. N7STU)
kr7o@vhfdx.com
www.vhfdx.com (KR7O/YB2ARO homepages)
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|