VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter

To: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>, "Gabor Horvath, VE7DXG" <ve7dxg@rac.ca>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter
From: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:29:37 +0000
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Think a little more about the Rovers.  I made many contacts while in motion and 
could not have even guessed what my 6 digit grid was.  Even at stops, unless it 
was one that I had planned in advance, I didn't know.  A distance based score 
would require purchase of a GPS that gives this information and that's not 
amateur equipment.  Its nice to have and not horribly expensive, but its not 
part of the requirements to be on the air.

Steve - K4GUN

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net> 

> Hi Gabor 
> 
> I would and have for years like to see distance based scoring for the VHF 
> contest. This keeps coming up and talked about but nothing ever happens. 
> Some of the issues are that contest logging software would need to be 
> developed and used by all entries. 6 digit grid square information may or 
> may not need to be used. The old record scores may or not stand. I think the 
> rover stratigy would change some but not so much for the fixed station. More 
> stations might seak higher locations or increase their antenna system to get 
> more distance. The guys in the less populated areas could take advange of 
> distance. I am sure there are many changes that would be involved but after 
> reading all the comments on ethics and rule interpetation on the reflector, 
> I doubt that we could ever make it work as a group. 
> 
> For me working long distance on VHF and up is what it is all about. 
> 
> 
> Ron W4WA 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Gabor Horvath, VE7DXG 
> wrote: 
> 
> > Wow, passionate replies... 
> > Yeah, I drove 300km to start the contet in a rare grid (CO60) just to find 
> > that instead of the 60 elements I got 15-20' above the car I would've got 
> > away with 5. 
> > A 6m opening greatly cuts down the number of 2m (and up) QSOs, especially 
> > the number of DX worked. I'm not gonna CQ off .200 for 20 minutes for a 
> > lousy new grid when I can "run 'em" on 6m with my shiny new whip. 
> > It'd be nice to see a contest with some sort of distance based scoring. We 
> > all know our 6 digit grid square (see Spring Sprints). Give 1p/km on 6m, 
> > 2p/km on 2, 3p/km on 432, etc. The Sprints might be a good start for such a 
> > system. I'd rather eke out an 300 mile CW contact on 2m then working 10 
> > guys 
> > in 2.5 minutes down the street. 
> > 73, 
> > Gabor, VE7DXG 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > VHFcontesting mailing list 
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com 
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting 
> > 
> _______________________________________________ 
> VHFcontesting mailing list 
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>