Bruce, WW1M, is correct. The single op rover category was ignored. I know I put
that in my response to the survey. I'm sure others did too. If there was
anything that would have been more positive than a single op rover category, I
can't think of what it would be. I've created my own rover category - Ex Rover
and also Ex Vhf Contester. Anyone interested in a TS-2000x and rover size
antennas for the bands that it covers? Drop me an e-mail if interested or catch
me on the CW end of 160 and 80 meters.
Also, the 200 watt limit on 6 and 2 and power limits on the other bands for
rovers was a stupid inclusion in these "new", "better?" rules.
73,
Dave N8AG
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|