To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rover |
From: | "Rick R" <rick1ds@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:13:58 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I have lobbied for many years to have a separate category for 1-op rovers vs
multi-op rovers. The rationale is that 1 person does not have the capability to do what 2 people can in terms of driving and operating, not to mention the physical needs sometimes involved in set-up and breakdown at each stop, if that's the kind of rover you have. And the two ops can be running QSOs simultaneously on two bands, but one op can only operate 1 band at a time. I certainly would not mind having a separate category for the multi-op rover, just like we have a category for the multi-op fixed station. But let's not think that it's a fair match for 1 person alone to compete with what 2 or more can! 73, Rick, K1DS/R _________________________________________________________________ See what you?re getting into?before you go there http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 56, Issue 7, Rick R |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] One Missing Rover, John Geiger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 56, Issue 7, Rick R |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 56, Issue 9, Greg Chartrand |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |