VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest, a two band contest

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest, a two band contest
From: "Eric NM5M" <nm5m@aol.com>
Reply-to: Eric NM5M <nm5m@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:00:08 -0600
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I still fail to understand why adding a 3rd or 4th band is so difficult.
Individuals can always decide which bands to have operational.   If two
bands are all you can do then that is fine, however restricting the format
to only two bands because its simple keeps this contest from being more
popular.

Regards,

Eric NM5M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey Embry" <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>
To: <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest, a two band contest


> I like the two-band approach primarily for the simplicity.  I don't
> have to worry about antennas for other bands and I don't have to worry
> about requesting moves to multiple bands.  Sometimes a laid back
> contest is just what the doctor ordered.
>
> -- 
> Jeff Embry, K3OQ
> FM19je
> ARCI #11643, FPQRP #-696,
> QRP-L # 67, NAQCC #25, ARS #1733
> AMSAT LM-2263
>

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>