VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] The Rover Flaw

To: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] The Rover Flaw
From: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:55:30 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
But if they should allow retransmission of signals
thru the APRS network, shouldn't they also allow
repeater and satellite QSOs to count for the contest? 
And maybe even Echolink.  Heck, CQ counts Echolink
QSOs towards DX awards.

73s John W5TD

--- Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I'm not talking about running some modified APRS in
> Simplex. I'd like to see the rule makers take off
> the blinders and allow use of the APRS network as it
> currently exists. It's obvious that FM simplex isn't
> going to outdistance SSB or CW from a Rover. I guess
> I'm probably preaching to the choir here since it
> won't have any impact on the rule makers. It's a
> good thing the VHF/UHF contests are in the Summer
> because at this point in the Sunspot Cycle I'd be on
> the CW low end of 160 and 80  if it weren't for the
> high level of noise.
>    
>   Dave, N8AG
> 
>  
> ---------------------------------
> Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people
> who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>