VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Terrestrial Contest Survey

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Terrestrial Contest Survey
From: Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:08:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I just finished "scanning" the survey results, and more importantly, the 
comments.

I hope the committee will see some patterns in these comments.  I 
noticed that many people objected to some of the questions that required 
an answer, even though their opinion wasn't a valid option.


My suggestion:  Go over the comments and re-word the survey, and issue 
it again.

Yes, this will slow things down.  But I think it's much more important 
to have accurate results than it is to have fast results...

Another tip:  I doubt that many of the responses would have included 
their call if they knew you were going to publish their comments!  I 
know there was an effort made to remove the calls and emails, but many 
were included in the comments.  Keep the responders calls private so 
they will not hesitate give honest answer.

73
Dan
-- 
K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269 
Check out the Rover Resource Page at: <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla> 
List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books 
Ask me how to join the Indiana Ham Mailing list! 


>   
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Terrestrial Contest Survey, Dan_K9ZF <=