I was only confused because the string started with an rover station up
here. We have several family situations up here. In fact we could use a
nice 14 member ham family in DN08.
frank bechdoldt
> [Original Message]
> From: <K3EGE@aol.com>
> To: <bdh@teleport.com>; <VHFContesting@contesting.com>
> Date: 1/21/2006 4:05:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] K3EGE and W3EFH on 6 bands for the contest
>
> Bruce;
>
> You are correct. We are NOT rovers but operating from our home QTH (Fixed
> station) and both of us are licensed to this address.
>
> Good luck in the contest.
>
> 73,
> Bill
>
> He didn't say anything about being a rover. I believe multiple calls
> from a family station are perfectly legal.
>
> Bruce WW1M
>
> frank bechdoldt wrote:
> > he sends in a check log. He would also like to see that as an added
> > category, well in fact so would I because 3 or 4 people would make
roving
> > more safe.
> > Oops thats our guys out here. Yeah, the father son team should use one
call
> > unless they are trying to inflate everyone elses score.
> > K3uhf/ frank
> >
> > frank bechdoldt
> >
> >
> >
> >>[Original Message]
> >>From: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
> >>To: <K3EGE@aol.com>; <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>;
> >
> > <rover@mailman.qth.net>
> >
> >>Date: 1/20/2006 9:06:25 PM
> >>Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] K3EGE and W3EFH on 6 bands for the contest
> >>
> >>I may be wrong on this, but I don't think the ARRL will accept scores
> >
> > from
> >
> >>two separate rover entries utilizing the common equipment in the same
> >
> > vehicle.
> >
> >>At 03:17 PM 1/20/2006, K3EGE@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>K3EGE and W3EFH (Son and Father family station) will be operating
using
> >
> > both
> >
> >>>calls in the contest this coming weekend from FM29ix near Philly with
6
> >>>meters thru 1296 plus light.
> >>>
> >>>If any rovers are in the area and you have laser capability, please
> >
> > feel
> >
> >>>free to stop by for a laser contact.
> >>>
> >>>Good luck to all and see you on the bands.
> >>>
> >>>73,
> >>>Bill - K3EGE
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>VHFcontesting mailing list
> >>>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>VHFcontesting mailing list
> >>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|