VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] FS: Kenwood TS2000

To: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com>,vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FS: Kenwood TS2000
From: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k3uhf@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:19:11 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
We could also change it to where the rover can thereby work himself at the
corner of an intersection 
but only if using EME, the rover would send, step on the gas and recieve in
the new square, x-mit then slam it into reverse and recieve the returning
transmission

However the use of low noise floor digital would not be allowed because we
all know thats cheating.




> [Original Message]
> From: John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK <k9jk73@msn.com>
> To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Date: 8/18/2005 10:12:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FS: Kenwood TS2000
>
> > THis makes a great all in one VHF contest package.  Very easy 
> > to take along the main VHF/UHF bands while you are out grid 
> > circling or being someone's capative rover. Or buy it for one of 
> > your capative rovers.
>
> Or maybe a rover could buy it for a Captive Fixed Station. 
>
> Ideally, said "captive fixed station" should be in a Grid that the rover
typically goes to but the rover is never able to work anyone from that Grid
to get that particular multiplier himself even though the rover supplies
the Multiplier to many stations...the "captive fixed station" would be
required, however, to work no one EXCEPT for the rover to which the fixed
station is captive and the rover would stop going to that particular grid
since the rover is now assured to get that multiplier himself. The captive
fixed station doesn't even have to drive and doesn't need to dedicate the
entire weekend to the contest...just be there as the rover reaches new
grids.
>
> Of course, the captive fixed station would end up being as mythical as
the captive rover.
>
> 73, JK
>
> (Yes, I KNOW I should have changed the subject but Sean and Mike would
have hit delete. ;- )
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>