| To: | VHF Contesting e-Mail List <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest? |
| From: | Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
--- Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> wrote:
> The 10 GHz contest is quite different from any other
> contest. For one thing, the number of stations
> available is usually limited.
But that can be said for a group of west Texas rovers,
too. Why the outcry over grid circling in VHF
contests, but no controversy in the 10-GHz contest
where ratios of 10 loggings per callsign were
celebrated as an accomplishment?
Again...I'm asking out of curiosity. I'm not
complaining in the least.
Ev, W2EV
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] What cost and expected benefit to compete?, Radiosporting Fan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] W2EV Plans: The ARRL 10 GHz and Above Contest, Radiosporting Fan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest?, Zack Widup |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest?, Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |