VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [VHFcontesting] Vhf com. members

To: Mike Clarson <mclarson@rcc.com>
Subject: RE: [VHFcontesting] Vhf com. members
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:36:18 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Yes, that's true from my experience.

I had an awful time in one contest last year.  I think it was the 
ARRL September VHF QSO Party. My IF rig for the lower bands (50 through 
432 MHz) stopped working on SSB and I forgot my key/keyer. I was QRP 
portable, about 15 miles from home. I had to work everyone on those bands 
by tapping two clip leads together to send CW! Still, I worked people and 
it was fun.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Mike Clarson wrote:

> I agree, and I use it. MUCH easier to find and peak a beam on a CW signal.
> This would provide an incentive to use CW, as it is not segregated like on
> HF.--Mike, WV2ZOW
> 
>> 
>> People who don't know CW are missing QSO's in VHF contests.  If that's 
>> all right with them, it's all right with me.  Gives me more QSO's they 
>> don't make!
>> 
>> CW is the mode of choice when the band conditions aren't hot on all 
>> bands 144 MHz and up.  I'll often hear someone call CQ on SSB and try 
>> to work them but can't get through.  Then I call them on CW and they 
>> usually either answer on SSB or on CW.  But cross-mode QSO's are all 
>> OK in VHF contests.
>> 
>> 73, Zack W9SZ
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>