VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: changes needed

To: "paul goble" <goblefam@swbell.net>,"Steven H Sawyers (na0ia)" <steve@sawyers.org>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: changes needed
From: "David Hinton" <ke4yyd@gtcom.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:58:26 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I like the distance multipliers and I am certainly not a privileged
contester.  Low power station with highest antenna 80 ft above sea level...
making long distance contacts are just more fun.  I don't get many adjacent
grid contacts anyway.  I am the only contester in my grid and probably less
than  a half dozen contesters within a 100 mile radius.

David
KE4YYD
EL79

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "paul goble" <goblefam@swbell.net>
To:
> NOT SURE ADDING DISTANCE MULTIPLIERS IS GOING TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED
> PURPOSE.  I THINK IT WILL GIVE AN ALREADY PRIVILEDGED GROUP EVEN MORE OF
> AN ADVANTAGE (THE BIGGEST ANTENNAS ON THE HIGHEST MOUNTAIN WITH THE MOST
> POWER WILL NOW HAVE AN EVEN BIGGER SCORING ADVANTAGE OVER THE MASSES
> THAN THEY ALREADY HAVE) - NOT THAT THE PLAYING FIELD CAN EVER BE LEVEL;
> I'M NOT AT ALL BEGRUDGING THE "BIG GUNS" THE ADVANTAGE THEY ALREADY
> HAVE(!!!); JUST WONDERING WHY WE SHOULD INCREASE SAID ADVANTAGE WITH
> SUCH A RULES CHANGE.
>


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: changes needed, David Hinton <=