VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence...

To: jewen@shaw.ca, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence...
From: ADUHAWK@aol.com
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:59:01 EST
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
JAMES -- (ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS) PAT AND I HAVE NEVER WORKED EACH OTHER. YOU 
CANNOT WORK EACH OTHER ON THE SAME EQUIPMENT AND WE HAVE NEVER BROUGHT ALONG 
OTHER EQUIPMENT TO WORK EACH OTHER.    

FRANKLY, I THINK TEAM ROVING, WHILE LEGAL IN THE RULES "MANUFACTURES 
CONTACTS" AND ARTIFICIALLY INCREASES SCORES.  OF COURSE ROVERS ONLY COMPETE 
AGAINST 
OTHER ROVERS AND SINCE WE ARE THE MINORITY NO ONE SEEMS TO MIND.

WE LIVE IN AN ABSOLUTELY NO ANTENNA 45 UNIT BUILDING WITH LITTLE ABILITY TO 
AVOID RFI.  FOR US ROVING IS THE ONLY WAY WE CAN OPERATE EFFECTIVELY IN VHF 
CONTESTS.  IF WE DROVE TO A GRID LINE AND EXCHANGED 16 CONTACTS WE WOULD HAVE 
MUCH HIGHER SCORES.  LOOK AT THE SEPTEMBER RESULTS.  WE WERE BESTED IN OUR 
REGION 
BY ANOTHER "UNASSISTED" ROVER.

WE DO NOT CHEAT. YOU INSULT US BY IMPLYING THAT WE DO.  PLEASE NOTE WHO IS 
BEING COPIED DIRECTLY ON THIS MESSAGE.   
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>