VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Contest Rule Revisions

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Contest Rule Revisions
From: W4nf@aol.com (W4nf@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:20 2003
As the coordinator for the W4IY VHF Contest Group I don't agree with limiting 
the number of ops at a LM station.  It takes us at least 7-8 people to move all 
the equipment up the mountain for each contest and set up.  These things 
include 2 to 3 generators, 3 AB 577 masts, 2 25G towers, stacked beams on 6 
thru 432, radios, amps, computers, etc.  The reason we went to LM after years 
of Unlimited Multi operating was we did not have the number of people necessary 
to set up all the equipment nor the operators needed to keep the stations on 
the air during the contest.  Further, there was no way we were ever going to 
place above 7th in the Unlimited Multiop category given the competion and our 
limited resources (people and equipment).  We would love to put up all the 
stuff we have on 903, 1296, 2304 and 10G as considerable time and money has 
benn expended but the manpower to assemble it all and then man the stations has 
just not been available.  Anyone want to join us at W4IY is welcome and if we 
get enough people to come up the mountain with us maybe we can start working 
the higher bands again.  I think this is a great discussion going on and I 
support anything that will make the contest more interesting and draw more 
participation.  See you from FM08jm at 4300 feet, Flagpole Knob, 30 miles west 
of Harrisonburg, VA.  73, Jack W4NF

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Contest Rule Revisions, W4nf@aol.com <=