Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes
From: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 06:32:34 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
K9YC wrote:

"A first approximation of the effectiveness of a choke in a specific installation can be computed in NEC by adding a resistive load equal to the resistive choking Z to the model, which includes the feedline as an element of the antenna, including the physical geometry of the feedline and it's connection at the station (for example, to an entry panel bonded to premises ground)."

Jim, one of the reasons I wrote the program is because I suspected using the resistive part of the choke impedance often was overly conservative. The small number of models I had done suggested that reduction of choking effectiveness due to the reactance of the choke combining unfavorably with that of the coax shield was not an issue. But the models were necessarily simplified, which leads me to the second reason. I think it is impossible to model the common-mode circuit for many antenna installations to any useful level of accuracy. The impedance of the coax shield depends on what it connects to and what it couples to. The connection part is hard enough when you consider all of the possible current paths. I think the coupling part is impossible to model. The coax may drop vertically next to a tower leg and other cables. At the ground it may approach other conductors. It may pass vegetation or structures that act like lossy a dielectric. Because the lengths involved are large, coupling can be significant. The separation to other conductors may be impossible to determine, either because it can't be measured for practical reasons or because it varies. The dielectric properties of objects are anyone's guess.

You can eliminate these uncertainties by measuring the impedance of the common-mode circuit. Doing so eliminates the necessity of guessing how much choking impedance is enough and whether you need to consider the resistive part alone. The equation I use allows the reactances to add or subtract.

You can easily add a Bluetooth module to a NanoVNA. This lets you control the VNA from a cell phone. You attach the VNA and split-core probe to the coax, hoist it into position, and make a measurement from the ground. You can do this at more than one spot to find the most effective location. No need to sever the coax to try a choke.

Finally, I doubt most people need to measure a choke let alone the coax. Installing a well-tested choke design at the antenna feedpoint will probably cure most common-mode issues. If problems remain, measurement and calculation can help to determine where to install a second choke.

Brian

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>