Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] re; STEPPir ANTENNAs

To: "'Richard \(Rick\) Karlquist'" <richard@karlquist.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] re; STEPPir ANTENNAs
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 21:54:02 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Plus with only very high antennas there are huge nulls at very useful radiation 
angles.  I am not sure why there is an elevation rotator, hopefully it was for 
moon bounce and not to attempt to change the radiation angle.

John KK9A

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com> 
Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2025 9:34 PM
To: john@kk9a.com; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] re; STEPPir ANTENNAs

A stack in 2 dimensions like that only works well on one band.
It won't be anything great whether SteppIR's or any other tribanders are used.  
W6BH tried a stack of KT34's (only vertical stacking) and it didn't work very 
well, which should have been obvious without building it.  As was said, more 
cents than sense.

73
Rick N6RK

On 4/5/2025 9:27 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> K9LTN became a silent key in 2009.  It would be interesting to know if 
> that system ever worked and what happened to it.
> 
> John KK9A
> 
> 
> David Gilbert AB7E wrote:
> 
> I wonder what happened to it.  K9LTN is an expired callsign.
> 
> Dave   AB7E
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/5/2025 7:23 PM, john at kk9a.com wrote:
>> Imagine this maintenance headache:
>> https://www.kkn.net/dayton2006/K9LTN.pdf
>>
>> John KK9A
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>