Grant,
Thanks for thinking about this, really appreciate it.
We did not notice a *bend* in the wire while it was loose - however, our
main concern was getting all the guys back in service and getting the
tower straight again before anything Really Bad were to happen. I'm
looking at my photos which I shot from the anchor looking along the
wire, and don't see anything.
I'm confident that there was no grip slippage or thimble collapse at
ground level. Did not get a look at the tower end of the wire. The guys
have no midspan connections.
Understand about the un-twist phenomenon, which I think is why guys
loosen up after construction and need to be re-tensioned at least once
or twice later on.
I'm thinking I'll recommend the guy replacement and after some period of
time a P&T. All the guy wires seem a little loose - all we did was match
the existing by feel (which I'm pretty good at after all the years).
Thanks again.
-Steve K8LX
On 10/13/2022 9:08 AM, Grant Saviers wrote:
Steve,
I got to thinking more about your question - am wondering what you decided.
I assume you measured the small (0.2%) change in length when resetting
the guy to the initial specified tension. That would confirm the actual
inelastic stretch, or some combination of thimble collapse, grip or clip
slip. Then if there are insulators, those repeated.
Also wondering if there was any slack tension bending deformation at the
tree impact site on the EHS? That would be a sign of exceeding the
yield point of some of the EHS fibers. Pretty much a "replace it"
observation.
EHS also having a twist will want to un-twist (apparent stretch) when
under tension beyond initial setting and suspect at high tension that
behaves as a one time apparent "stretch" and does not relax when tension
is removed. EHS has a slow twist for this reason. Another variable not
well defined, and lacking any data I could find for EHS. Way back for
my Phillystran guy project, I did come across some info re old straight
fiber Phillystran vs new twisted which showed the apparent higher
elasticity of the twisted.
btw comments like "EHS doesn't stretch" are wrong. The modulus of
elasticity of soft vs very hard steel is essentially the same, thus for
a given force a piece of steel stretches the same soft or super hard.
What is different is the yield point and how sharp and short that
transition is to the break point. This is widely misunderstood.
Hope that is helpful.
Grant KZ1W
On 10/12/2022 16:48, Grant Saviers wrote:
6" over 360ft = 0.139%. I think that is less than the spec initial
pretension stretch for EHS. I couldn't find the yield spec or stress
strain curve but it's likely around 90% of break.
However what you don't know is how much this guy was stretched in the
past.
Given the cost to replace vs liability for guy failure, this seems
like a time to be conservative and replace the guy.
Grant KZ1W
On 10/12/2022 11:29, Steve Maki wrote:
I have a question for the materials crew here. I'm writing up a job
report.
Our crew went to a site where a huge tree had fallen on the two lower
guys of a 360' tower. We carefully (well as carefully as we could)
slacked off & disconnected one wire at a time, threw it over the
tree, and reconnected it. At that point the site was ready for the
tree crew to come.
It was obvious that one of the wires (3/8" EHS) had stretched a few
inches. There were enough unused threads in the turnbuckle to enable
a good snug wire again.
I'm recommending that the guy wire be replaced, but was wondering how
much strength in roundabout numbers is lost in this scenario?
TIA
-Steve K8LX
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|