Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Tribanders

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Tribanders
From: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 19:17:10 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Funny ... Ron privately answered me to thank me for the correction.

I never said that HFTA wasn't extremely valuable.  I used it when designing my station to determine the optimum heights for my antennas given my terrain profile ... at least within the physical limits of hwat I could afford.

What I said was that HFTA is of no use in determining optimum stacking separation, and I stand by that statement.

Dave   AB7E




On 6/21/2022 6:43 PM, Billy Cox wrote:
Dave G. ... did you miss or ignore this line of Ron's reply?

"One without the other is a waste of time."

Ron is correct, neither program provides a complete answer,
as both have known limitations. On the other hand, Ron is
quite the fast learner, as demonstrated by the excellent
station he has built, with scores that support his planning.

73 de Billy, AA4NU

On 06/21/2022 3:48 PM David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com> wrote:

That's just plain wrong.  That's using HFTA to determine optimum height
above ground ... not optimum stacking distance (i.e., separation).  They
are NOT the same thing.  HFTA does NOT properly calculate anything based
upon stacking separation.

Dave   AB7E



On 6/21/2022 11:23 AM, Ron WV4P wrote:
HFTA should Always be used to try to optimize stacking distance.
  It shows the nulls and enhancements created by Your Terrain, and how
to exploit and or cover them. Then you can use another program, like
EZNEC to calculate the stacking gain as a function of stacking
distance based on the HFTA data.

One without the other is a waste of time.

HFTA tells you where to put the antennas.
EZNEC tells you what antennas to put there.

Ron, WV4P

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:00 PM David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com> wrote:


     HFTA should never be used to try to optimize stacking distance.  It
     simply does not actually calculate the stacking gain as a function of
     stacking distance like EZNEC would.

     73,
     Dave   AB7E



     On 6/21/2022 10:34 AM, sawyered@earthlink.net wrote:
     > HFTA kinda sorta calculates stacking properly.  It seems to
     assume you get
     > the optimum 2.7db stacking gain whether the spacing is optimum
     or not.  And
     > it draws the HFTA ray from the center point between the 2.  So
     it would
     > calculate a 2 high stack of 20M yagis having an added 2.7db of
     gain even if
     > they are stacked only 20 ft apart and will draw the enhanced ray
     from the
     > midpoint between the 2 yagis.
     >
     >
     >
     > Ed
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     >
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > TowerTalk mailing list
     > TowerTalk@contesting.com
     > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

     _______________________________________________



     _______________________________________________
     TowerTalk mailing list
     TowerTalk@contesting.com
     http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>