To: | "TowerTalk@contesting.com" <TowerTalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison |
From: | "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Sep 2021 12:36:21 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Instead of using rules of thumb from ancient history, you can get a far
more precise answer by simply modeling the antennas under test and the
test source on EZNEC. Should take 10 minutes or less. If you can't
go far enough to get into the far field, you will at least know the correction factor at the distance you can do. The modeling results also provide a sanity check on your actual measurement. 73 Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison, Lux, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison, Lux, Jim |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison, Lux, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |