On 7/8/21 8:05 AM, Haring family wrote:
Check his revision history and you should find it. He documents things
well.
The rev history here: https://www.eznec.com/Updates50.html
doesn't mention it.
There are a few issues with variable definitions in COMMON blocks
(documented on W7AY's site), and the use of Intel Specific calls for
command line arguments, etc. (not really bugs, more a "platform" issue,
and a problem with a constant not being double precision.
regards,
Dave N3AC
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:35 AM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com
<mailto:jim@luxfamily.com>> wrote:
>> Dan Maguire ac6la wrote:
>>
>> Just posted by Roy Lewallen, W7EL:
>>
>> https://eznec.com/retirement.htm <https://eznec.com/retirement.htm>
>>
In that retirement page, Roy mentions a known bug in NEC4.2. Does
anyone
have more information on that?
"At the time of this writing, the compiled NEC-4.2 from LLNL has been
found to contain at least one bug (which has been repaired in the
current EZNEC Pro/4), and the recently released NEC-5 has a
substantial
number. There is currently no one at LLNL able to fix these and no
one
outside LLNL authorized to distribute updated versions, so anyone
purchasing those programs and using them with the public domain EZNEC
Pro program will encounter the bugs and may not have any way to
get them
fixed."
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com <mailto:TowerTalk@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|