Hi, gang,
I'm trying to characterize some coaxial cables and various connectors, and the
results from my two measuring methods aren't reconciling well. My understanding
of the tools is also less than complete. :)
Method 1: Transmission mode sweep with MiniVNA.
Method 2: RF Power meter and TX. Calibrate: Connect TX output to RF power
meter, then through the test length of coaxial cable, then to dummy load.
Carefully set TX output to to 10 W. Swap test cable and power meter, so TX
output now goes to test length of cable, then to power meter, then to dummy
load. Record power levels of between 7 and 9.1 W with TX power set to same
level as "calibration " run, but with meter now placed after test cable length.
Testing 100-foot lengths of RG-6, RG-11 and RG-213.
Problem 1: When sweeping 50-ohm cables from 1-30 MHz, the insertion loss
curve/line gently slopes downward, indicating greater loss at higher
frequencies (expected). When sweeping 75-ohm cables, the insertion loss line
slopes downward a bit with increasing frequency, but the line is a shallow sine
wave and not a straight descending line. Averaging the peaks and valleys of the
descending sine wave produces results that agree reasonably well with published
loss specs.
>From VNA, loss values for 100 feet @ 30 MHz are: RG-6, 1.6 dB (avg of sine
>wave peak values); RG-11, 0.9 dB (avg of sine wave peak values); RG-213, 1.1
>dB; RG-8X, 1.5 dB.
With the power meter, loss values are RG-6, 3 dB; RG-11, 1.9 dB; RG-213, 2.8 dB
As you can see, these methods don't line up well.
Help?
--Kirk, NT0Z
My book, "Stealth Amateur Radio," is now available from www.stealthamateur.com
and on the Amazon Kindle (soon)
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|