Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vees

To: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>, towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vees
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:31:03 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>


On 6/15/2020 3:55 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
Inverted Vs are compromise antennas in most cases compared to flat top

height of an inverted V is the average between the apex height and the
height of the ends.  So a 60 foot high apex with the ends on the
ground is pretty much like having a flat top at 30 feet.  All is not
lost.  If you can hoist an inverted V up high on say, a 100 foot
K5UJ


The above analysis would seem to be predicated on the assumption of
uniform current in the wires.  Of course, it is far from uniform, being
heavily weighted towards the center.  If the current were parabolic
(as a rough guess), the effective height in the above example would
be 45 feet, if you want a rule of thumb.  Better yet, model it.
Takes 5 minutes.

73
Rick N6RK
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>