Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF)

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF)
From: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:39:09 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I didn't see anything in the abstract that made me want to read it as
far as ham radio is concerned.   A number of hams over the past years
have cited military work with cloud burners as a justification for
their usefulness in ham radio.   I don't contest a horizontal antenna
that has its highest field intensity straight up, but I do contest the
argument for ridiculously low hanging antennas because that's what
other services do.   There are several differences between ham and
other services that have to do with power limits, frequency
exclusivity, transmission modes, battle conditions, and radiation
efficiency.

73
Rob
K5UJ
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>