Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] NEC4 server

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NEC4 server
From: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:50:33 +0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
It sounds fantastic to me.
I use to run NEC2 quite often and sometimes I would like to compare results 
with NEC4, just in case.
Sometimes I ask a good friend with NEC4 to run it for me, so to be able to run 
NEC4 myself, online, would be great.

Thanks

73, Maximo - EA1DDO


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: sábado, 9 de noviembre de 2019 23:42
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NEC4 server

> On 11/9/2019 11:34 AM, jimlux wrote:
>> I've been thinking about putting up a server that would run NEC4.2 on 
>> user submitted decks - The idea is you would upload your input deck, 
>> and then, sometime later, your output would be there to download. 
>> Single run at a time, some sort of queuing system, some sort of 
>> "maximum run time".  After some period of time, your output file would 
>> disappear (depends on how much disk space I have)
>>
>> (Just for context, I've been running a bunch of jobs recently for a 
>> variety of designs with >600 segments, the GN3 Sommerfeld-Norton 
>> ground, and run times are about 5 seconds per frequency)
>>
>> It would be free, as an experiment. Sort of like the servers that will 
>> produce a aziumuthal map centered at a user entered location.
>>
>> The idea is that you can run your NEC2 jobs, and then, after 
>> iterating, and you want to verify against the higher quality modeling 
>> that NEC4 provides, you could do that.
>>
>> Or, if your job is simple enough and runs fast enough, you could 
>> iterate a design that has buried wires, etc.
>>
>> I do need to look into the NEC4 license agreement to make sure it's 
>> permitted. There's no export control issue - the executable (and 
>> source) are export controlled (EAR, not ITAR), but input and output 
>> data is not.
>>
>>
>> I'm looking for feedback on the idea - any interest in it?
>> Any suggestions on implementation or features?
>>
>>
>> Jim, W6RMK
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>