Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks for responses - Cinch Jones

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks for responses - Cinch Jones
From: Nidhog <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:25:00 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My first try.

https://www.amazon.com/Power-Plug-Socket-P308CCT-S308CCT/dp/B07K4X8C7D?SubscriptionId=AKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q&tag=duckduckgo-ipad-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B07K4X8C7D

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:51, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/21/19 9:30 AM, Dan Atchison via TowerTalk wrote:
>> Thanks to all who responded.
>> My original post neglected to mention I was looking for 8-pin Cinch Jones 
>> inline connectors, M and F (300 series).?? I did find some on eBay and 
>> ordered them at a premium.
>> For those who suggested electronics distributors - which I had prior to my 
>> email - here's what I found:
>> Jameco - no eight pin and few others
>> Mouser - no eight pin and few others
>> Newark - no stock, only large quantities
>> Digikey - ditto
>> Electronics Surplus - most not in stock, 8 pin, no of course
>> Cinch Jones connectors where the defacto standard seemingly forever, but I 
>> guess times have changed.
> 
> The Jones plug was invented by Howard Jones in the 1930s, and saw a lot of 
> use in WW II as a multipin connector, so there was a lot of surplus available 
> post war. It's not surprising that some of the older ham gear was designed to 
> use that connector, and it was in wide use up through the 50s, and probably 
> 60s.
> 
> That said, I don't know that I've seen *new* equipment using Cinch Jones 
> connectors designed in the last 50 years (since 1970), except for something 
> made to be compatible with earlier vintage equipment. Flat blades, no locking 
> mechanism, no environmental protection. 300 series is 250V, 10A contacts, 
> which isn't particularly exotic.
> 
> 
> I suppose, if you've got an application where there's lots of mate demate 
> cycles but limited vibration, the flat blade and spring works ok - it wipes 
> on mate, and it's inexpensive to manufacture.
> 
> It's just that there's so many potentially better connectors out there these 
> days. Things like locking capabilities, shrouded contacts, good vibration 
> handling, inexpensive termination and cable manufacturing, etc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Several of you responded with Anderson Powerpoles which are fine, but no 
>> strain relief - at least I can't find them with strain reliefs.?? To me 
>> that's an important option because I disconnect everything when the station 
>> is not in use - regardless of my grounding to Motorola's R-56 standards in 
>> which, as I knock on wood, I've not had a lightning strike (nice run-on 
>> sentence).?? Murphy, keep your distance.
> 
> Indeed, there's no powerpole "housing" with a separate cable clamp (like, 
> e.g., the inexpensive circular plastic connectors). However, the "pull out 
> force" for the contact, once it's inserted in the housing, is pretty high.
> 
> There are panel mount configurations that interlock with the little channels 
> on the powerpoles.
> 
> 
> So maybe the question is what strain are you looking to relieve?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>