Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tarnished connectors

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tarnished connectors
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:23:36 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 8/20/19 4:16 PM, Wes wrote:
I agree.  Also when going to gold, most  (all)  commercial plating shops will put down a nickle barrier on the base metal then plate with gold. If the gold is too thin and the skin depth too deep, your gold surface is RF wise, actually nickle.

I once designed a test station for X-band IMPATT diodes and we built the prototype 1/4-height waveguide oscillator in-house and did our own plating in the model shop.  Since we were going to calibrate and supply a number of these to our IMPATT vendors, we had the design replicated and sent the plating job to an outside vendor.  If you simply specify minimum total plating thickness, you get lots of nickle and a flash of gold.  It took lots of hours to figure out why we weren't getting any power output.



there's an excellent description of this on microwaves101.com in the multitude of pages on skin effect.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>