Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Question on R-TA-45 Torque Bracket

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Question on R-TA-45 Torque Bracket
From: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 21:31:11 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
All great points. A tall skinny tower with slip rings, with many large antennas, in a high wind area, is a temporary setup IMO.

-Steve K8LX

On 06/15/19 20:32 PM, Steve Bookout wrote:

Hello all,

Couple of comments on K4JA's tower failure.

The lower half of the tower was shielded from some of the wind by way of tall trees at the edge of the field, where the woods started.  The upper half went way above the trees and took the full force of the wind.

Also, his stuff was fully rotating from the base up to the top, with slip rings at the guy points.  Because of this, the guys really had nothing to do with limiting the twisting of the tower. It just twisted as it wanted all the way from the ground to the top.

I would not put more on a tower than Rohn's wind load ratings allow just because a torque guy is used. A 6 way star guy does a great job of minimizing twisting.  There is more leg compression since there are more guys wires however a Rohn 45 is designed to go 300' high and the tower in the post is only 110'. I believe that twisting can cause tower failure, K4JA's tower twisted back and forth in hurricane winds until it failed. Adding a star guy is probably a good thing if the antenna has a long boom. I use star guys and a taper pier pin base on all of my towers.

John KK9A


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>