Is it possible that there is an antenna for a local AM broadcast station
near you? If so, that might be upsetting the analyzer that you are using.
In that case, I use my rig and an SWR bridge and test the SWR with a few
watts.
Good luck. I think Hans has a very good point also . The quality and
material used in some coax can be a problem,.
73,
Dave, K4TO
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:45 AM Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <
towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
> Something is definitely wrong. You should have no problem using the RG59
> for your dipole.
>
>
>
> It is not the easiest thing to get a good contact with the shield on the
> RG59 as the braid sometimes is made of steel or stainless steel. The "real"
> shield is the aluminum wrap under the braid.
>
>
> If nothing else use F-connector to make sure you have a good contact with
> the cable and then go from there. I am sure that will help.
>
>
> Just my penny thought,
>
>
> 73 de,
>
>
> Hans - N2JFS
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: felix1063 <felix1063@comcast.net>
> To: 'Grant Saviers' <grants2@pacbell.net>; towertalk <
> towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sat, Aug 11, 2018 12:07 am
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RG-59
>
> I should have mentioned that the shield on the RG59 is shorted with the
> center conductor at both ends. My results with the dipole element cut for
> 80 meters is that the dipole is un-tunable with an antenna analyzer. In
> fact, the antenna does not tune to anything from 1.8mhz to 14.5mhz. At the
> cut frequency, the impedance is 50 ohms, but the SWR is greater than 10:1.
> I have used RG58 with good results. I used RG59 because it's diameter is
> larger than RG58 and should produce a larger bandwidth.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> --jeff WB7AHT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:35 AM
> To: felix1063@comcast.net; towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RG-59
>
> Yes, assuming you mean using the shield as the conductor. The larger the
> diameter, the greater the bandwidth, thus RG59 shield helps a bit.
> The formulas for diameter vs bw are in most handbooks. The RG59
> insulation reduces the velocity factor and thus the antenna will be
> electrically longer by a few percent than the usual dipole formulas
> calculate. NEC based modeling software can model the effects of thin
> insulation like on RG59.
>
> Otherwise, it is a dipole and a choke is a good idea.
>
> Grant KZ1W
>
>
> On 8/9/2018 16:14 PM, felix1063@comcast.net wrote:
> > Has anybody ever used RG-59 as the radiating elements in a dipole? If
> > so, what were the results? Was it easy to tune? Did the bandwidth of
> > the dipole change appreciably from using a piece of stranded wire? Was
> a balun used?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > Wb7aht
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|