Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Auto tuners, Baluns and open wire feeders

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Auto tuners, Baluns and open wire feeders
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:50:43 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 7/17/18 10:43 AM, Mark Spencer via TowerTalk wrote:
Hi:

I spent some time trying out various wire antennas at the summer cottage and 
have more or less settled upon a dipole antenna fed with a short length of open 
wire feeder that runs from the antenna feed point to slightly above ground 
level, the open wire feeder is in turn connected to a Johnson match box (a 
tuner with a balanced line connection), which in turn feeds a coaxial cable 
that runs to the radio.  The tuner sat on top of a short step ladder during my 
tests.

The coaxial cable had various mix 31 and mix 43 ferrite chokes applied.  It all 
more or less worked as I expected it would on various bands.

Moving forwards I'd like to replace the Johnson Matchbox with an auto tuner.  
At this point I'm leaning towards purchasing a suitable Balun from DX 
engineering, connecting that to the output of my SGC231 tuner and replacing the 
Johnson Match box with the Balun and the auto tuner.   I'll have to do some 
modelling (to figure out the likely range of feed point impedances  for the 
dipole antenna at various frequencies) before deciding on what ratio Balun to 
buy.   I expect I'll install the auto tuner and Balun on top of a wooden pole 
perhaps 10 feet or so from the ground.

I am curious if anyone else has done something along these lines and if there 
are any issues with doing so ?  Any comments would be welcome.

I'd like to move away from using a commercially made trap dipole at that 
location.   (The appearance, lower weight and wind loading of a simple wire 
dipole with a short open wire feeder is attractive to me, plus I need to use a 
tuner to match the existing trap dipole.)




I support your idea..
Having the tuner at the feedpoint is the ideal. And whether the circuitry inside the box is symmetric or not makes no difference. It's two terminals.

Yes, you need a choke on the coax at the tuner (which is what forces the above statement - you don't want currents going down the outside of the coax).

I'm not actually sure you need a transformer at the antenna side tuner, unless you're putting the tuner some distance away, in which case, the higher Z balanced line *might* reduce the loss. But not necessarily, unless it's "many wavelengths" long. That is, the loss through the transformer, and a short <1/4 wavelength length of transmission line at a different Z might actually be more than just the short length of transmission line.

(in some ways, this isn't much different than an off center fed dipole: being off center is effectively a transformer to a different impedance than at the center)

You'd have to run the math on it.

The key thing you'll need is the "feedpoint Z vs frequency" of the antenna and to know what frequencies you want to operate at.

The other thing you'll want to know is what's the loss in the tuner at various mismatches. I believe this has actually been measured and reported in QST and QEX.

Do you want to have X1 dB of loss in the tuner without a transformer, or Y db of loss and Z dB of loss in the transformer, where you choose X or (Y+Z). Again, it's something you need to calculate.

How long is your feeder? How long is your dipole? what bands are you operating on?


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>