While one can argue as to the absolute need for a DIN vs. other
connector type, I'm pretty sure that everyone who has used DIN will
confirm - a DIN is a vedddddyyyyy great connector.
I hate N connectors because the reliability of that connector depends on
getting the center pin aligned lengthwise in the connector shell
perfectly. Too far in and it will not seat properly. Too far out and
it will split the female mate. Of the 100 UHF and 50 DIN I put up last
year, it's one of the 6 or so N connectors on the entire site which has
given me trouble. I'm sure a guy with more experience would say N works
just fine. But UHF and DIN are harder to screwup by comparison at least
in my limited experience.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com
On 26-Jun-18 12:49 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 6/26/2018 7:31 AM, Michael Clarson wrote:
The wireless industry is starting to use another connector -- the
4.3/10 DIN. Much more robust than the Type N, but unlike the 7/16
DIN, it
is sized for greater connector density for feed-lines typically used by
hams. Great. Now I have to get even more interseries adapters!
I don't understand this fixation on the latest and greatest for
components whose differences don't matter for 99.9% of ham operation!
How is this different from the teenagers who have to have the latest
and greatest smart phone, or the guy who has to have the latest model
vehicle in his driveway every year?
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|